|
Canadian Priorities Agenda
Project Directors: Jeremy Leonard, Christopher Ragan and France St-Hilaire.
The Canadian Priorities Agenda (CPA) is designed to initiate a
broad-based and informed public debate on policy choices and priorities
for Canada over the medium term. The central theme of the project is
scarcity and the need for choice: governments have limited resources
and therefore must choose carefully which policies to pursue and which
to leave behind. In so doing, they must weigh not only political
considerations, but also the overall costs, benefits and distributional
effects of alternative policies. One of the main objectives of the CPA
is to produce research on key policy challenges within a common
analytical framework based on that overarching perspective.
Phase I - Setting the agenda
In January 2006, the IRPP brought together a group of twelve
distinguished policy experts to decide on the most important broad
policy challenges facing Canada over the medium term. The results of
this meeting, along with each participant's top priorities and
rationale, were published in the April/May 2006 issue of Policy Options.
Phase II - Commissioning the research
Based on the results of the agenda-setters meeting, the IRPP
commissioned a research paper for each of eight broad policy
challenges. In addition to describing the nature of the challenge at
hand, each analyst was asked to propose three specific policies
designed to address this challenge and to analyze the overall effects
of these polices. Each paper will be reviewed by two critics (experts
in relevant disciplines and practitioners), who provide their
assessment and critique of the paper.
| Policy Challenge |
Author |
Critics |
Human capital policy brief |
W. Craig Riddell (University of British Columbia) |
Serge Coulombe (University of Ottawa)
Jane Gaskell (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education) |
Climate change policy brief |
Mark Jaccard and Nic Rivers (Simon Fraser University) |
Christopher Green (McGill University)
James Meadowcroft (Carleton University) |
Natural resources policy brief |
Nancy Olewiler (Simon Fraser University) |
Vic Adamowicz (University of Alberta)
Peter Victor (York University) |
Population aging policy brief |
David Foot (University of Toronto) |
Peter Hicks (Human Resources and Social Development Canada)
Susan McDaniel (University of Windsor) |
Economic security policy brief |
Jean-Yves Duclos (Laval University) |
David Green (University of British Columbia)
Kathy O'Hara (Human Resources and Social Development Canada) |
Health outcomes policy brief |
Robert Evans, Clyde Hertzman and Steve Morgan (University of British Columbia) |
Dennis Raphael (York University)
Raisa Deber (University of Toronto) |
Productivity policy brief |
Andrew Sharpe (Centre for the Study of Living Standards) |
Don Drummond (TD Bank)
Richard Harris (Simon Fraser University) |
Trade and globalization policy brief |
Michael Hart (Norman Paterson School of International Affairs) |
Jonathan Fried (International Monetary Fund)
Keith Head (University of British Columbia) |
Phase III - Making the choices
In the final phase of the project, the analysts and critics were
convened in March 2007 to present their arguments to a panel of six
judges, eminent individuals chosen for their knowledge and expertise in
Canadian economic and social policy:
- Wendy Dobson (Professor, Rotman School of Management and former federal Deputy Minister of Finance)
- Alain Dubuc (Syndicated columnist for La Presse and author of Éloge de la richesse)
- John Helliwell (Research Fellow, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Professor emeritus, University of British Columbia and author of Globalization and Well-Being)
- Richard Lipsey (Fellow, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Professor emeritus, Simon Fraser University and co-author of Economic Transformations)
- Carolyn Tuohy (Professor emeritus of political science, University of Toronto)
- William Watson (Associate Professor of economics, McGill University and columnist, National Post, Montreal Gazette and Ottawa Citizen)
Based on the evidence gathered, the critics' comments and the
follow-up discussions held at the symposium, each judge has been asked
to choose from among the 24 specific policy recommendations the "policy
package" that will best enhance the economic and social well-being of
Canadians.
|