| Jul 10, 2010 |
|
Trueman Tuck speaks out about Bill C-6 Questions and Health Canada and your sovereign legal rights
Clink on the following picture to hear a short (10 excerpt - part 2
below) from the full 46 minute "Power to the People" lecture as a
primer to the questions and text below: "Focus entirely on the constitutional and charter violations of C-6.
Do NOT mention natural health products in any way, shape or form. If
you do, you will likely be dismissed with a reply that C-6 specifically
exempts NHPs. This is a bogus response. Schedule 1 of C-6 includes
foods, drugs, cosmetics, devices and explosive. Schedule 1 can be
revised at any time to include NHPs. Further, the Health Minister has
another
[full story]
|
|
| Jun 28, 2010 |
|
Australian courts rule that Vioxx should never have been approved for sale
(NaturalNews) Australian courts recently ruled that Vioxx, a popular
prescription painkiller, should never have been approved and allowed on
the market.
[full story]
|
|
| Jun 28, 2010 |
|
Doctor's Data Laboratory Files Federal Lawsuit Against Barrett, Quackwatch, NCAHF, Consumer Health Digest...
Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen Friday, June 25th, 2010
Stephen Barrett, who has no income of his own, he claims, had to go
to his wife Judith the other day, I think, and say "Honey, I need an
increase in my allowance this month. I'm getting sued in Fed Court in
Chicago now, and I'm going to need $250,000 this month as a retainer,
and another $100,000 per month to pay for my Defense, for the next
year, or so."
On Friday June 18th, 2010 Doctor's Data Laboratory filed an eleven
count lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Northern
District of Illinois against Stephen
[full story]
|
|
| Jan 12, 2010 |
|
Body scanners coming to Canadian airports
Dozens of body scanners will be installed in Canadian airports to
comply with new U.S. security protocols, the federal government
confirmed Tuesday.
Rob Merrifield, minister of state for transport, said 44 scanners
ordered on Tuesday will be used on passengers selected for secondary
screening at Canadian airports.
CBC News has confirmed that the machines, which can scan through
clothing, be installed in Vancouver, Calgary, Edmonton, Winnipeg,
Toronto, Ottawa, Montreal and Halifax.
[full story]
|
|
| Jul 19, 2009 |
|
Supreme court quashes drug conviction over illegal search
Supreme court quashes drug conviction over illegal search
Last Updated: Friday, July 17, 2009 | 3:52 PM ET
Comments1036Recommend222
CBC News
A woman walks past the Supreme Court of Canada in Ottawa. (Tom Hanson/Canadian Press) Canada's
top court tossed out a drug conviction linked to the seizure of 35
kilograms of cocaine Friday, saying evidence obtained with "willful and
flagrant" disregard for the Charter of Rights and Freedoms can't be
used in trial.
The ruling was one of four handed down by the Supreme Court aimed at
clarifying
[full story]
|
|
| May 24, 2009 |
|
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom, justice and peace in the world,
UN Declaration of Human Rights On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Following this historic act, the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories." Preamble Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of
[full story]
|
|
| May 24, 2009 |
|
s outlined by the majority the proper function of the implied bill of rights after the adoption of the Charter is to 'fill in the gaps' in the express terms of the constitutional texts.
Implied
Bill of Rights is a
judicial theory in Canadian jurisprudence that recognizes that certain basic
principles are underlying the Constitution of Canada. Invoked more often
before the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms was enacted it is nonetheless important when questions of parliamentary supremacy and the override
power come into play. It played a part in the reasons given in the Reference re Secession of Quebec
[1998] 2 S.C.R. 217.
The
concept of an implied bill of rights develops out of Canadian federalism. When provincial
legislation intrudes deeply into
[full story]
|
|
| May 24, 2009 |
|
Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice.
Monday, December 05, 2005 Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice. Beverley McLachlin, in a speech delivered in New Zealand, took on critics who say judges have no business going beyond the strict letter of the constitution to strike down laws and enforce rights. "The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion," said a prepared text of the lecture Chief Justice McLachlin
[full story]
|
|
| May 24, 2009 |
|
Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice.
Monday, December 05, 2005 Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice. Beverley McLachlin, in a speech delivered in New Zealand, took on critics who say judges have no business going beyond the strict letter of the constitution to strike down laws and enforce rights. "The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion," said a prepared text of the lecture Chief Justice McLachlin gave
[full story]
|
|
| May 24, 2009 |
|
Under Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491, the legislature does not have the power to abrogate the Citizen's Right to travel upon the public roads by passing legislation forcing the citizen to waive his Right and convert that Right into a privilege.
Under Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491, the legislature does not have the power to abrogate the Citizen's Right to travel upon the public roads by passing legislation forcing the citizen to waive his Right and convert that Right into a privilege. Furthermore, it was long since established that this "privilege" has been defined as applying only to those who are "conducting business in the streets" or "operating for-hire vehicles." The legislature has attempted (by legislative fiat) to deprive the Citizen of his Right to use the roads in the ordinary course of life and business, without affording
[full story]
|
|
| Mar 24, 2009 |
|
Trueman Tuck along with a delegation of Health Freedom Fighters will meet in Ottawa in an attempt to put to end Bills C-51, C-52 and the now Bill C-6 and Bill C-10 as well as the Drug Class Natural Health Products Regulations that have been strangling ..
We need our hopes and prayers behind the Ottawa meetings this March 30 and March 31.
Trueman Tuck along with a delegation of Health Freedom Fighters will meet in Ottawa in an attempt to put to end Bills C-51, C-52 and the now Bill C-6 and Bill C-10
as well as the Drug Class Natural Health Products Regulations that have been strangling the Natural Health Products Industry.
A Bit About Trueman Tuck:
Trueman Tuck who's office resides in Belleville Ontario is an upright walking, friend, advocate and defender of people, families and their small to medium business enterprises. Fighting
[full story]
|
|
| Mar 19, 2009 |
|
The issue of a 'People's Mandate' relates to advancing the position that the People are Sovereign over the Parliament.
The People's Mandate
The issue of a 'People's Mandate' relates to advancing
the position that the People are Sovereign over the Parliament. The government
of the day is the servant of the Sovereign People who create it. A petition by
the People to the government is but a plea, and carries no weight other than to
inform the government of the views of a group of people. A 'People's Mandate'
is quite different in that it is a direct order or instruction from the
Sovereign People to their servants, the government, to do or not to do a
specific thing. A government
[full story]
|
|
| Feb 10, 2009 |
|
"Man is free at the moment he wishes to be." - Voltaire
How To Become A Sovereign Individual -- "Man is free at the moment he wishes to be." - Voltaire You can create your own personal sovereignty. You can own your own life. It will not be utopia or without challenges, but you can start re-defining yourself today. Many are uncomfortable with personal choice and prefer others lead them -- personal choice does require personal responsibility. Even more are uncomfortable with others having personal choice -- and want to dictate their lives. If you desire liberty for yourself and others, first discover how it is being achieved today. There are people
[full story]
|
|
| Jan 15, 2009 |
|
If you are not FREE, you are a SLAVE.
Dear Fellow Australians,
NO KANGAROO COURTS! WEAR A I GREEN RIBBON FOR JUSTICE!
It's spot-on in the Bible where it says that "in the place of judgment wickedness was there and in the place of justice iniquity was there"....because that's what we have today. The definition of a Court is "a place where Justice is administered" ....and the definition of Justice is "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs". The definition of a Kangaroo Court is "a court that acts unfairly or dishonestly or disregards legal rights or disregards legal procedures.
ALL AUSTRALIAN COURTS
[full story]
|
|
| Dec 5, 2008 |
|
Of course, it is NO LAW because no Act of Parliament can take away the Rights of the People...but it's what the traitorous Judges use against us in our Courts.
Dear Fellow Australians,
Attached is a JPG of the last page of the NSW Supreme Court Act 1970 which contains s.85 saying there will be NO JURIES unless a Judge wants one.
Thanks go to Mr Wayne Merton (State Member for Baulkham Hills) and his staff for their efforts to obtain and photocopy it from the Archives.
The fellow who signed it was the late Sir Arthur Roden Cutler, VC.
I still can't believe that a much-loved and respected Victoria Cross winner would knowingly betray the People of Australia.
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 12, 2008 |
|
If you have a birth certificate, or SSN/SIN, or a citizen"ship" number, you are the owner of a stock certificate - but not it's managing holder. Guess who is holding it and managing your share?
Rob Menard's new "security of the person" video is online:
CLICK HERE:
Did you know you own a share of not just the national debt, but also of the national wealth?
If you have a birth certificate, or SSN/SIN, or a citizen"ship" number, you are the owner of a stock certificate - but not it's managing holder. Guess who is holding it and managing your share?
Due to Canada's great wealth in natural resources, it is individually worth up to an estimated $400,000 a year, paid to the individual in quarterly dividend payments.
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 6, 2008 |
|
Trial by Jury is Democracy....and denying Trial by Jury is TREASON.
Dear Fellow Australians,
I had a phone call yesterday from the "Associate" to "Justice" Hislop of the NSW Supreme Court, to say that the "Judge" would be handing down his "Judgment" to a Notice of motion from the Crown Solicitor representing the State of New South Wales in an action brought by me by way of a Summons for Unlawful Arrest of me because the "Reasons for Arrest" in the Arrest Warrant were not true, ie: it said I did not attend the Burwood Local Court on 30 July 2008 ...whereas, in fact, I have the Court Transcript as proof that I was there.
To read the Court Transcript of my
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 6, 2008 |
|
Switzerland started the new millennium with a new legal foundation. On January 1, 2000, the new Swiss Federal Constitution entered into force, replacing the Constitution of 1874. Already in the 1970s, the Federal Council created an expert commission to
JURIST's Switzerland Correspondent is Cyrill P. Rigamonti, Esq., Dr.iur., University of Zurich Faculty of Law.—————————————————————————————The New Swiss Constitution and Reform of the Federal Judiciary [Zurich; Special to JURIST] This first report on the latest developments in Swiss law will focus on the recent changes in constitutional law and the subject matter of the upcoming ballot of May 21, 2000, when the Swiss people will vote on the adoption of seven bilateral agreements negotiated by the Swiss Federal Council with the European Union. An overview and discussion of recent changes in
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 29, 2008 |
|
He said the public was justifiably outraged when people who committed the worst crimes were given soft sentences, or no jail at all.
Dear Col,
Trial by Jury is Democracy.
Subverting and/or extirpating the Right to Trial by Jury is TREASON.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message ----- From: Col To: John Wilson Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2008 11:17 AM
Subject: Scrapping juries .................the wedge!
G'day John,
deja vu ??
Regards
Col
www.news.com.au/heraldsun/story/0,21985,24564386-2862,00.html?referrer=email
Scrap some juries to speed justice - DPP Jeremy Rapke
Article from: Geoff Wilkinson
October 28, 2008 12:20pm
REMOVING juries in some criminal
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 23, 2008 |
|
Universal Declaration of Human Rights Adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948
On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights the full text of which appears in the following pages. Following this historic act the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."
PREAMBLE
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 19, 2008 |
|
TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY ....which means that People have Sovereignty and they exercise that ultimate authority to make and impose laws by way of the unanimous Judgments of twelve free and equal men
Dear Fellow Freedom Fighters,
WORLD PEACE means Peace between Nations and Peace within Nations.
TRIAL BY JURY means Justice, Equality, Freedom, and the Rule of Law.
I urge everyone to go and see the Magna Carta Monument in Canberra and to read the great works on Trial by Jury.
TRIAL BY JURY IS DEMOCRACY ....which means that People have Sovereignty and they exercise that ultimate authority to make and impose laws by way of the unanimous Judgments of twelve free and equal men who ask "SO HELP ME GOD" in order for them to administer Justice.
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 10, 2008 |
|
Thomas Jefferson wrote: "The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body
Thomas Jefferson wrote: "The germ of destruction of our nation is in the power of the judiciary, an irresponsible body - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall render powerless the checks of one branch over the other and will become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we separated.".
And Sir William Blackstone wrote: "UPON these accounts the trial by jury even has been, and I trust ever will be, looked upon as the glory of the English
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 20, 2008 |
|
It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”.
LEVELS OF JURISDICTION
OR
THE RULES OF THE GAME
It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 20, 2008 |
|
All law, in fact, hangs on loving God and loving your neighbour as yourself (Matthew 22: 35 – 40).
MORE EVIL THAN TREASON:
Dear Friends in Liberty,
“And this occurred because of false brethren secretly brought in (who came in by stealth to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus, that they might bring us into bondage),” (Galatians 2:4)
If we are to be free, we must apply the Rule of Law which is “1. The supremacy of law. 2. A feature attributed to the UK constitution by Professor Dicey (Law of the Constitution, 1885). It embodied three concepts: the absolute predominance of regular law, so that the government has no arbitrary authority over the citizen; the equal
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 13, 2008 |
|
The Virginia Declaration of Rights is a document drafted in 1776 to proclaim the inherent natural rights of men, including the right to rebel against "inadequate" government. It influenced a number of later documents, including the United States
The Virginia Declaration of Rights is a document drafted in 1776 to proclaim the inherent natural rights of men, including the right to rebel against "inadequate" government. It influenced a number of later documents, including the United States Declaration of Independence (1776), the United States Bill of Rights (1789), and the French Revolution's Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen (1789). The Declaration was adopted unanimously by the Virginia Convention of Delegates on June 12, 1776 as a separate document from the Constitution of Virginia adopted on June 29, 1776.[1] It
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
King Alfred the Great (849, ruled 871-899) was one of the best kings ever to rule mankind. He defended Anglo-Saxon England from Viking raids, formulated a code of laws, and fostered a rebirth of religious and scholarly activity [Charter / Constutition]
KING ALFRED THE GREAT
King Alfred the Great (849, ruled 871-899) was one of the best kings ever to rule mankind. He defended Anglo-Saxon England from Viking raids, formulated a code of laws, and fostered a rebirth of religious and scholarly activity. His reign exhibits military skill and innovation, sound governance and the ability to inspire men and plan for the future, piety and a practical commitment to the support of religion, personal scholarship and the promotion of education. "Desire for and possession of earthly power never pleased me overmuch, and I did not unduly desire this earthly
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
THE CHARTER of LIBERTIES (1100.) is important as Henry 1 formally bound himself to the laws, further establishing King Alfred's " GOD'S JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RULE OF LAW" most important principle - "THERE IS NOT SUPREMACY / DIVINE RIGHT
The CHARTER of LIBERTIES of HENRY I (1100.) This charter, granted by Henry when he ascended the throne, is important in two ways. First, Henry formally bound himself to the laws, setting the stage for the rule of law that parliaments and parliamentarians of later ages would cry for. Second, it reads almost exactly like the Magna Carta, and served as the model for the Great Charter in 1215.
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
International Covenant [CHARTER] on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assemblyresolution 2200A (XXI) of 16 December 1966
entry into force 3 January 1976, in accordance with article 27
status of ratifications declarations and reservations Preamble
The States Parties to the present Covenant, Considering that, in accordance with the principles proclaimed in the Charter of the United Nations, recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights of all members of the human family is the foundation of freedom,
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
Canadian Charter [Covenant/Declaration] of Rights and Freedoms 1982
Schedule B
Constitution Act, 1982 Enacted as Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (U.K.) 1982, c. 11, which came into force on April 17, 1982 PART I Canadian charter of rights and freedoms
Whereas Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God and the rule of law:
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. Fundamental Freedoms
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
Herbalists Charter [Covenant / Declaration] of Henry the VIII
Herbalists Charter of Henry the VIII Annis Tricesimo Quarto and Tricesimo Quinto. Henry VIII Regis. Cap. VIII. An Act That Persons, Being No Common Surgeons, May Administer Outward Medicines Were in the Parliament holden at Westminster in the third Year of the King's most gracious reign, amongst other things, for the avoiding of Sorceries, Witchcrafts, and other Inconveniences, it was enacted, that no Person within the City of London, nor within Seven Miles of the same, should take upon him to exercise and occupy as Physician or Surgeon, except he be first examined, approved, and admitted
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
INTERNATIONAL DECLARATION [CHARTER / COVENANT] OF HEALTH FREEDOM 2006
World Health Freedom Assembly 2006
St. Paul, Minnesota
***Held at the William Mitchell College of Law***
On September 29th and 30th, 2006, a World Health Freedom Assembly met in St. Paul, Minnesota and adopted and proclaimed an International Declaration of Health Freedom, the full text of which appears below. Following this historic act the assembly called upon all members of the human family, organizations, and countries present, and those others that wish to support this statement, to publicize the text of the Declaration and “to cause it to be honored, implemented, disseminated, displayed,
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
“Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.”44 [Charter / Declaration / Covenannt]
The Covenants of the gods The contractual nature of governments of the world From the book The Covenants of the godsLaw (The legal system of God) vs. Legal (The lawful system of man)
To investigate is the way to know what things are really lawful.43 “Because of what appears to be a lawful command on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what only appears to be a law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance.”44
In the above statement the Supreme court talks of “what only appears to be law” “on the surface.” What are we so ignorant of, that we would
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
For over two centuries, millions of Americans based upon the finest Judeo-Christian Charter / Constutition / Covenant / Declaration in the World have prayed to GOD. That has make the USA PEOPLE OWNED AND OPERATED REPUBLIC since 1776 a strong nation.
President Bush: "It's the duty of all nations to acknowledge the providence of Almighty God"Remarks of President Bush on National Day of Prayer - May 3, 2007
WASHINGTON, May 3, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Today Americans are celebrating National Day of Prayer. Demonstrations before the Supreme Court will include William "Bill" Murray, whose famous mother, Madelyn Murray O'Hare, used her son to legally end voluntary prayer in public schools in 1963. Today however, Murray heads the Religious Freedom Coalition and will join in the National Day of Prayer service on the High Court's
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
Charter / Constutition/Covenant and Majority Rule - For then the law of majority vote is itself a sort of fundamental law. And thus it is not the will of the people but the will of each party and every individual that is sovereign.
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Popular Sovereignty as Pitfall As some of you are aware of, I am working on (in fact, nearing completion of: word count is now approaching 100,000) the constitutional law volume of Stahl's Philosophy of Law. Just this morning I translated a section which, at first glance, seems "over the top" in terms of its utter rejection of the concept of popular sovereignty. But the more I think about it, in the light of my earlier posts regarding the machinery of manipulation, the more I can see the truth in what Stahl is arguing. And that truth is this: that popular sovereignty
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
GOD'S JUDEO-CHRISTIAN LAWS are the basis of all fair and just TRUE RULE OF LAW legal foundations for a valued and principled REPUBLIC such as was attempted to be established in the USA Declaration / Charter / Covenant / Constutition of 1776
LAWS OF GOD: CODIFIED
A Document to re-establish the long forgotten Theocratic Laws and rules that pertain to the Universe, to the People of the planet Earth and, in particular, the People of Australia and its possessions.
Whereas Australia was founded, established and civilized by people of the Christian faith based upon the Word of God as described in the Holy Bible;
And whereas through neglect, disregard and abuse of the blessings allotted to Australia and its possessions by pagan-minded leadership and a culpable population, the Christian faith of the land has been obfuscated and
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
Charters/Covenants/ Constutition. God did not create evil. Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is n
This is profound. Thought you'd like it.
Did God create everything that exists? Does evil exist? Did God create evil?
The University professor challenged his students with this question. "Did God create everything that exists?" A student bravely replied, "Yes he did!"
"God created everything?" The professor asked. "Yes sir", the student replied. The professor answered, "If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principal that our works define who we are, then God is evil." The student became quiet before such an answer. The professor,
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
Understanding the legal foundations of the Judeo-Christian Charter / Covenant/ Constutition/Declarations - the Canadian Implied Bill of Rights
Canadian Implied Bill of Rights
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Implied Bill of Rights is a judicial theory in Canadian jurisprudence that recognizes that certain basic principles are underlying the Constitution of Canada. Invoked more often before the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms was enacted it is nonetheless important when questions of parliamentary supremacy and the override power come into play. It played a part in the reasons given in the Reference re Secession of Quebec [1998] 2 S.C.R. 217.
The concept of an implied bill of rights develops
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
The History of the Common Law [GOD's JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RULE OF LAW AND THE UNALIENABLE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS - THE PROCALMATIONS / CHARTERS / DECLARATIONS / WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN CONSTUTITIONS / ETC. ] of England by Matthew Hale 1713
The History of the Common Law [GOD's JUDEO-CHRISTIAN RULE OF LAW AND THE UNALIENABLE LEGAL FOUNDATIONS - THE PROCALMATIONS / CHARTERS / DECLARATIONS / WRITTEN AND UNWRITTEN CONSTUTITIONS / ETC. ] of Englandby Matthew Hale1713
I. Concerning the Distribution of the Law of England into Common Law, and Statute Law. And First, concerning the Statute Law, or Acts of Parliament The Laws of England may aptly enough be divided into two Kinds, viz. Lex Scripta, the written Law: and Lex non Scripta, the unwritten Law: For although (as shall be shewn hereafter) all the Laws of this Kingdom have some
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
On Our God-given Charter Judeo-Christian Rights / Freedooms & Liberties / Covenants / Constutitions / by Patrick Henry 1775
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 2:22 AM
Subject: WE ARE NOT SUBJECT
Patrick Henry March 23, 1775
All men and women are created with equal rights. These rights are such that we all may exercise them simultaneously without interfering with or infringing upon the rights of another. This is freedom.Government -- ALL government -- has intentionally become destructive to our freedom and liberty. Instead of securing and protecting the natural rights of man, as government is designed to do, in every nation of this world it has sought to usurp its people and to reduce them under complete despotism.
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
To understand your Charter / Constitutional / Covenant / Declarations in Canada see e-archive index below
Tuck's Professional Services Reference Centre Constitutional Acts 1763-2001
Brought to you by TrueMan of the Tuck family, a Soverign Being / Child of God
see www.truemantuck.ca and / or www.tucksprofessionalservices and / or www.friendsoffreedominternational.org
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
The Constitution of the United States 1787 [Charter / Covenant / Declarations]
The Constitution of the United States 1787 We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
"The rule of law requires judges to uphold unwritten constitutional norms, even in the face of clearly enacted laws or hostile public opinion," [Charter / Constutition / Covenant / Declaration/ God's Judeo-Christian Laws]
McLachlin urges judges to go beyond letter of law
Courts should defy legislation to protect rights, chief justice says
Janice Tibbetts
The Ottawa Citizen
Monday, December 05, 2005
Judges should feel "emboldened" to trump the written word of the constitution when protecting fundamental, unwritten principles and rights, says Canada's chief justice.
Beverley McLachlin, in a speech delivered in New Zealand, took on critics who say judges have no business going beyond the strict letter of the constitution to strike down laws and enforce rights.
"The rule of law requires
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
God's Judeo-Christian Rule of Law - Our most important legal foundation in regards to Charters, Covenants, Constutitions, Declarations and Common Law
The Canadian Rule of Law and the Courts Responsible government and federalism [TRUEMAN'S COMMENTS - THIS IS ONE OF "THEIR" LIES/FRAUDS - CANADA IS NOT A FEDERAL NATION - IT IS A CONFEDERATED CORPORATE COLONY OF THE ELITES AND ALWAYS HAS BEEN SINCE THE CONQUEST IN 1759] are two cornerstones of our system of government. There is a third, without which neither of the first two would be safe: the rule of law. What does the rule of law mean? It means that everyone is subject to the law; that no one, no matter how important or powerful, is above the law — not the government; not the Prime Minister,
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
... the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions; [Charter / Constutition / Covenant/ Declarat
Canadian Bill of Rights
1960, c. An Act for the Recognition and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
[Assented to 10th August 1960]
Preamble
The Parliament of Canada, affirming that the Canadian Nation is founded upon principles that acknowledge the supremacy of God, the dignity and worth of the human person and the position of the family in a society of free men and free institutions;
Affirming also that men and institutions remain free only when freedom is founded upon respect for moral and spiritual values and the rule of law;
And being desirous of enshrining
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 1, 2008 |
|
Values most commonly assigned to the Judeo-Christian tradition are Liberty and Equality based on Genesis, where all humans are created equal, and Exodus, where the Israelites flee tyranny to freedom [Charters / Covenants / Constutitions / Declarations]
Judeo-Christian (or Judaeo-Christian, sometimes written as Judæo-Christian) is a term used to describe the body of concepts and values which are thought to be held in common by Judaism and adapted by Christianity, and considered, often along with classical Greco-Roman civilization, a fundamental basis for Western legal codes and moral values. In particular, the term refers to the common Old Testament/Tanakh as a basis of both moral traditions, including particularly the Ten Commandments; and implies a common set of values present in the modern Western World. The values most commonly assigned to
[full story]
|
|
| Aug 31, 2008 |
|
As English men and women, the American colonists were heirs to the thirteenth-century English document, the Magna Carta, which established the principles that no one is above the law (not even the King), and that no one can take away certain rights.
When the last dutiful & humble petition from Congress received no other Answer than declaring us Rebels, and out of the King’s protection, I from that Moment look’d forward to a Revolution & Independence, as the only means of Salvation; and will risque the last Penny of my Fortune, & the last Drop of my Blood upon the Issue.
In 1761, fifteen years before the United States of America burst onto the world stage with the Declaration of Independence, the American colonists were loyal British subjects who celebrated the coronation of their new King,
[full story]
|
|
| Aug 31, 2008 |
|
The political philosophy of the 1776 US Declaration was not new; its ideals of individual liberty had already been expressed by John Locke and the Continental philosophers.
Drafted by Thomas Jefferson between June 11 and June 28, 1776, the Declaration of Independence is at once the nation's most cherished symbol of liberty and Jefferson's most enduring monument. Here, in exalted and unforgettable phrases, Jefferson expressed the convictions in the minds and hearts of the American people. The political philosophy of the Declaration was not new; its ideals of individual liberty had already been expressed by John Locke and the Continental philosophers. What Jefferson did was to summarize this philosophy in "self-evident truths" and set forth a list of grievances
[full story]
|
|
| Aug 31, 2008 |
|
1948 UN Declaration of Human Rights
UN Declaration of Human Rights
On December 10, 1948 the General Assembly of the United Nations adopted and proclaimed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Following this historic act, the Assembly called upon all Member countries to publicize the text of the Declaration and "to cause it to be disseminated, displayed, read and expounded principally in schools and other educational institutions, without distinction based on the political status of countries or territories."
Preamble
Whereas recognition of the inherent dignity and of the equal and inalienable rights
[full story]
|
|
| Aug 29, 2008 |
|
AUSTRALIANS ARE FREEMEN WITH AN INALIENABLE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY - BECAUSE JURIES NULLIFY BAD LAWS THAT DESTROY OUR LAWS AND OUR LIBERTIES.
ATTENTION: POLICE AND SHERIFFS.
DO YOU REALLY WANT TO BE USED TO DESTROY TRUTH, JUSTICE, FREEDOM AND DEMOCRACY?
THAT’S WHAT THE BANKS AND JUDGES HAVE YOU DOING.
**********************
AUSTRALIANS ARE FREEMEN WITH AN INALIENABLE RIGHT TO TRIAL BY JURY - BECAUSE JURIES NULLIFY BAD LAWS THAT DESTROY OUR LAWS AND OUR LIBERTIES.
[full story]
|
|
| Aug 27, 2008 |
|
Well you can’t get on with anything because I’m challenging the jurisdiction of the court. All proceedings cease.
ACCUSED: NO I’m here to challenge the jurisdiction of the court. I have it in written form and I’d like the stamp by the court and the court keep one copy and one copy to the opposition and I’ll keep the other two.
HIS HONOUR: All right so just before we get onto that Mr Wilson –
ACCUSED: Well you can’t get on with anything because I’m challenging the jurisdiction of the court. All proceedings cease. There is a peremptory stay of proceedings until the jurisdiction is determined by a special jury. That is the law.
[full story]
|
|
| Aug 18, 2008 |
|
In Tasmania, the people are currently subject to the most draconian family law that has ever been legislated in the history of the world. The destruction of the family unit continues to be legendary.
J.A.I.L. (Juries Against Illegal Laws)
As you are aware, 5 men are committing suicide each day in Australia due to the results of State and Federal legislation dealing with Family Law. In Tasmania, the people are currently subject to the most draconian family law that has ever been legislated in the history of the world. The destruction of the family unit continues to be legendary. Did you know, that last year in Victoria alone, that there were approximately 600 suicides by children. Most of these suicides are directly related to family break-ups. (source ABS) If you were to add
[full story]
|
|
| Aug 18, 2008 |
|
"Trial by Jury is the Palladium of Liberty" (anon) ... "our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 2:4).
Dear Fellow Australians,
The Juror's Oath ends with, "So help me God", in order to bind their conscience when judging the law and the facts.
Trial by Jury is asking for the help of God when twelve jurors, who are our equals, congregate to administer Justice.
We are Freemen and we have the Right to Trial by Jury.
"Trial by Jury is the Palladium of Liberty" (anon) ... "our liberty which we have in Christ Jesus" (Galatians 2:4).
Courts are places where Justice is administered ... and Justice is "the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs".
[full story]
|
|
| Jul 23, 2008 |
|
For bonded Bar attorneys, who in many cases may also be appointed, commissioned, or elected to 'public office' as 'Judge', 'Clerk of Court', etc. when/if their bond is complained against for good and reasonable cause, their b
Wednesday, April 9, 2008
Their Bonds are their buns! DUN & BRADSTREET: 'Rating Service' for all corporate entities'_Void for legal cause fraud _ "Brutum Fulmen"? by "S"TE ENTITIES'_Void for legal cause fraudThere are a few more things worth noting regarding the DUN & BRADSTREET listing service:D-B is a financial rating service for both 'public' and 'private' corporations. Utilities and municipal bond ratings would come under D-B perview for certain. It just really never occurred to me years ago when doing litigation discovery, research and analysis,
[full story]
|
|
| Jul 23, 2008 |
|
Of course, the "strawman/legal fiction" business is only a Challenge to the Jurisdiction of the Court, re: Relationship, from the point of view that these are entities created by the third level of jurisdiction, ie
Dear Fellow Australians,
Yesterday, at the Hornsby Local Court, I had little fling with the "strawman/legal fiction" gimmick with the "Magistrate", a grumpy 60-year old man name of Brennan...or is that BRENNAN?. He ignored the whole business and adjourned the matter to September 1. I asked him, "Are you listening to what I'm saying?" He answered, "No.", and ordered the Sheriffs' Officers to remove me from the Courtroom. There were about 70 other Defendants in the Courtroom. I managed to quickly advise everyone that they must find out about their Rights and told them that Australian
[full story]
|
|
| Jul 16, 2008 |
|
The following information should be taken very seriously. Many churches are coming out of the revised Roman system by relinguishing their 501 (c)(3) status. Where does your Church assembly stand in this matter?
Are you serving more than one Master? The following information should be taken very seriously. Many churches are coming out of the revised Roman system by relinguishing their 501 (c)(3) status. Where does your Church assembly stand in this matter?
The 501(c)(3) Tax Exemption Taking a License to Preach Is your church "government licensed and approved"? The incorporation of the local Christian assembly and application for the 501(c)(3) tax exemption is indeed the proof of such apostasy. The Ecclesia vs the Corporation ecclesia L. ecclesia, Gr. ekklesia 1577, ek-klay-see'-ah; from
[full story]
|
|
| Jul 16, 2008 |
|
The Right to Trial by Jury is pivotal to whether we have Democracy or Tyranny. If we have it, we have Democracy and we can avail ourselves of all our other Rights.
Dear Fellow Australians,
The Right to Trial by Jury is pivotal to whether we have Democracy or Tyranny. If we have it, we have Democracy and we can avail ourselves of all our other Rights. If we don't, then we can't and we are at the disposal of dictators and tyrants and will suffer all the injustices they chose to impose on us.
As is the practice of lawyers, history and truth, itself, are distorted and manipulated to our disadvantage. Here follows a brief item to compare what used to be and what is now. Before Trial by Jury, the strong ruled. Now, with Trial by Jury, we all
[full story]
|
|
| Jun 14, 2008 |
|
But yesterday the High Court struck back with a judgment that confirms there are limitations on the right of the police to stay on premises after the occupier has told them to leave.
Tip from down under
Greetings All,
A wee snippet for your perusal. Col.
CRIKEY
(crikey.com)13 June 2008
9 . High Court rules on the right to ask police to leave your premises
Greg Barns writes:
Civil liberties have taken a beating in Australia in recent years with governments of all hues consistently legislating to strengthen police powers. But yesterday the High Court struck back with a judgment that confirms there are limitations on the right of the police to stay on premises after the occupier has told them to leave.
In a 4-1 judgement, Chief Justice Murray Gleeson
[full story]
|
|
| Jan 30, 2008 |
|
Act to establish Trials by Jury
First Parliament. In the 32nd Year of George III. A.D. 1792 CHAP. II.An Act to establish TRIALS by JURY
Whereas, the Trial by Jury has been long established and approved in our Mother Country, and is one of the chief benefits to be attained by a freee Constitution ; Be it therefore enacted by the King's Most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Legislative Council and Assembly of the Province of Upper Canada, constituted and assembled by virtue of and under the authority of an Act passed in the Parliament of Great Britain, intitled, "An Act to repeal certain
[full story]
|
|
| Jan 2, 2008 |
|
As Members, we know that the authentic Trial by Jury is the only effective (peaceful) remedy known to mankind by which a barrier to state tyranny and the injustices perpetrated by prejudiced or incompetent judges are nullified and annihilated.
Dear Kenn, Joanna and Astra,
Another very good article and a "must read" for all.
However, I must pick you up on the constant wrongful use of the word, "government". Attached is a CLRG leaflet which explains what I mean.
Every form of the media and in every school, we are subjected to the repetition of the fraud that Parliament (Executive and advisory Houses, thereof) are the "Government". Joseph Goebbels (Hitler's Minister for Propaganda) said the People will accpet a lie, if the lie is big enough and repeated loudly and often.
I look forward to your next circular ...with
[full story]
|
|
| Jan 1, 2008 |
|
I am a 70 year old, retired Police Sergeant, living on pension. Such description satisfies my material existence, yet spiritually, I am a Christ. I live ashamed of my modern-day
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2007 5:39 AM
Subject: A Sovereign Man Takes off the Gloves: Tyrants Leave Office Or Face Ruination.
A Sovereign Man Takes off the Gloves: Tyrants Leave Office Or Face Ruination.
By: Raymond Ronald Karczewski© -- A Living Christ
I am one man, living in the Constitutional Republic known as the united states of America.
I am a Living, Breathing, Flesh-and-Blood, Sentient, Natural Man, a Son of God, a Servant of Truth. a simple man of Truth, a Christ. (That is all Jesus of Nazareth was -- A simple Man of Truth, a Living, breathing, manifestation of Truth which threatened
[full story]
|
|
| Dec 27, 2007 |
|
A Freeman has the Right to Trial by Jury IN ANY ACTION....if he wants to waive that Right for a particular action, he must sign a MEMORANDUM OF CONSENT to that effect.
Dear Eon,
Look at the wording of the propsed alteration.
"80. (1) The trial of a person for an offence, where the accused is liable to imprisonment for more than two years or any form of corporal punishment, shall be by jury EXCEPT IN THE CASE OF A TRIAL FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT or a trial of a member of the defence Force of the Commonwealth before a court-martial under a law relating to the discipline of the Defence Force of the Commonwealth." (my emphasis to the actual words).
If the 1988 Referendum result was "YES", the evil judges would have absolute power and they would use that
[full story]
|
|
| Dec 24, 2007 |
|
We need also to understand that God’s law is paramount and God gave man certain inalienable rights which no man can rend asunder.
From: Freedomtoo [ Freedomtoo@optusnet.com.au] On Behalf Of Leonard CeeSent: Sunday, 16 December 2007 1:50 PMTo: 'qldreg@fedcourt.gov.au'Cc: 'nswdr@fedcourt.gov.au'Subject: GRAHAM RAMSEY District Registrar Fe'ral Court Brisbane. Copy - Chief Fe’ral Magistrate John Pascoe nswdr@fedcourt.gov.au 16th December 2007
GRAHAM RAMSEY purporting to be the; District Registrar Fe’ral Court of Australia Registrar Fe’ral Magistrates Court of Australia Harry Gibbs Commonwealth Law Courts Building 119 North Quay Brisbane Qld 4000 qldreg@fedcourt.gov.au
GRAHAM RAMSEY,
On Wednesday
[full story]
|
|
| Dec 9, 2007 |
|
“Common Law doth control Acts of Parliament and adjudges them when against common right to be void”
GOING TO COURT:
“Where’s the Jury? I have the Democratic Right to Trial by Jury. It takes the congregation of 12 of my equals to form an Executive of Common Law to judge me. You are only a Public Servant, a creation of Bureaucracy, with no Jurisdiction over me, at all. I do not consent for the whole or any part of this action to be hear and tried without a Jury - therefore, the Court has no Jurisdiction to proceed summarily.”
****************
Democracy is the Rule of Common Law. Bureaucracy is the Rule of Statute Law. Common
[full story]
|
|
| Dec 5, 2007 |
|
it is our ignorance that allows the state and prosecutors to bring us into court and offer us a plea when in reality the court is in want of jurisdiction.
----- Original Message ----- From: Geo G To: John Wilson Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2007 8:16 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: Driver's License Challenge of Not Meeting Goals
all any license does is give permission to operate in commerce. "period"
it is our ignorance that allows the state and prosecutors to bring us into court and offer us a plea when in reality the court is in want of jurisdiction.
it is us that gives jurisdiction to the court when we answer in the form of a plea.
when we make a plea we are admitting that we were operating in commerce on the highway or under what
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 25, 2007 |
|
The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land, and any statute, to be valid, must be in agreement
Dear Gerrit,
The U.S. Constitution was never approved by a Referendum....was it?
Therefore, the U.S. Constitution is only a Statute, ie: an Act of Parliament, amended by Parliament, and cannot be construed to be the Law of the Land.
The Land is greater than any Parliament....is it not?
The Land I would equate with the People.
A Parliament is only Bureaucracy....and Bureaucracy is inferior to Democracy....ie: People Rule is superior Jurisdiction to whatever Parliament Rules.
At least the Australian Constitution was adopted by a majority of voters in a majority of States
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 21, 2007 |
|
Democracy is the Rule of Common Law - which is the Law of the People, by the People and for the People and is made by the unanimous Judgments of the congregations of 12 Freemen
COURTS ARE GOVERNMENT
Government is the system of governing – and to govern is to rule with authority.
Governance by the People is Democracy.
Governance by Judges and Magistrates is Bureaucracy.
Who has power in the Courts is the Government over the Land and the People.
Democracy is the Rule of Common Law - which is the Law of the People, by the People and for the People and is made by the unanimous Judgments of the congregations of 12 Freemen as Jurors, who ask “So help me, God” for them to administer Justice. Justice is “the protection of rights and the punishment of wrongs”.
Bureaucracy
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 18, 2007 |
|
Trial by jury is more than just an instrument of justice... it is the lamp that shows that freedom lives.
"Each jury is a little parliament... The first object of any tyrant... would be to make parliament utterly subservient to his will; and the next to overthrow or diminish trial by jury, for no tyrant could afford to leave a subject’s freedom in the hands of twelve of his countrymen... [T]rial by jury is more than just an instrument of justice... it is the lamp that shows that freedom lives."
Sir Patrick Devlin Trial by jury (1971) 164.
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 16, 2007 |
|
Congress can't pass a law that changes or erases any part of the constitution!
----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Lancaster To: Dr.Muhammad Mukhtar Alam ; Fred Bader ; Chuck Brucks ; cmarcu34668@peoplepc.com ; E.Crockett ; The "Exposé" ; Sorcha Faal ; Trinity Farms ; fascist_bush_004 ; Jeff Fisher ; Fresno Bee ; Godsmystery ; Idaho Observer ; Andy McCracken ; Merced Sun Star ; Judith Nipps ; Onion Newspaper ; Oregonian ; Stan Park ; Pay_the_Piper ; John Perna ; VirginiaF. Raines ; rcwcodebuster@comcast.net ; rich ; ricniemela ; Ron Paul 2008Ron Paul ; ronaldneil@sbcglobal.net ; RonPaulLiberty ; Cal Steinberger ; Stephen ; stu8340@comcast.net ; Sumerian.. ; Telegraph
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 8, 2007 |
|
"So what's the difference when you don't have Trial by Jury?"
"Campaign@democracydefined.org" <campaign@democracydefined.org> wrote: From: "Campaign@democracydefined.org" <campaign@democracydefined.org>To: "Campaign@democracydefined.org" <campaign@democracydefined.org>Subject: Justice vs Mammon. From Kenn d'Oudney.Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 19:26:03 +0100
BODY {
MARGIN-TOP: 25px; FONT-SIZE: 10pt; MARGIN-LEFT: 10px; COLOR: #0033cc; FONT-FAMILY: Arial, Helvetica
}
This is for your interest.Can you help alert the people?
Kenn.
www.democracydefined.org/The Home Page of The Democracy Defined Campaignfor RESTORATION and UNIVERSAL
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 8, 2007 |
|
Now an ORDER is a JUDGEMENT. These men are jailed, JUDGED to be guilty without a shred of evidence being presented and without the right to defend themselves in any way.
Dear Olga,
There is a recent movie on the American journalist and commentator, Ed Murrow, in which he said the same thing as you, ie: "We cannot fight for Liberty overseas while we lose it here, at home".
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Olga Scully" <liz@intas.net.au>
To: <liz@intas.net.au>
Sent: Friday, November 09, 2007 12:20 PM
Subject: [Fwd: AVO's - Presumption of Guilt and No Redress]
On November 7, 2007, I attended Court at St Helens, Tasmania.Mr Ray Escobar had been summoned by Tasmania Police to answer a charge of disobeying
[full story]
|
|
| Nov 6, 2007 |
|
Under Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491, the legislature does not have the power to abrogate the Citizen's Right
----- Original Message ----- From: Jack Bauer Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 7:45 AM
Subject: Driver's License Challenge of Not Meeting Goals
"If ye love wealth better than liberty, the tranquility of servitude better than the animating contest of freedom, go home from us in peace. We ask not your counsel or your arms. Crouch down and lick the hands which feed you. May your chains set lightly upon you, and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." Samuel Adams
INTRODUCTION
Under Miranda vs. Arizona, 384 US 436, 491, the legislature does not have the
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 24, 2007 |
|
Those who control surveillance control the country - it's dictatorial, not open innovative democracy."
"I've been following the privacy illegalities for a few years. I'm tired of it. It's time to return to the constitution - and take it seriously! It's there for a reason. I want this "land of freedom" to return to truly being "of freedom" Those who control surveillance control the country - it's dictatorial, not open innovative democracy." In my case, I also added: I've been to Russia - twice. I don't want any of it in my homeland. See here for more:
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 21, 2007 |
|
Consumer advocates and Web heavyweights like Google Inc. and Amazon Inc. cried foul, saying it's a bedrock principle of the Internet that all traffic be treated equally.
J.A.I.L. News JournalJudicial Accountability Initiative Law
______________________________________________________Los Angeles, California October 20, 2007
______________________________________________________
The Battle Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power
A Power Foreign to Our Constitution Mission Statement JNJ Library Federal J.A.I.L.
FAQs What?MeWarden?www.sd-jail4judges.org
Corporations Seek To Undermine And
Play Politics With The Internet
Associated Press
Comcast Blocks Some Internet Traffic
ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gxRiQSVfgK4sLbVRE_X4MOlM9q0AD8SCASPG0
By
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 16, 2007 |
|
The fact of the matter is that ALL humans have many inalienable "natural" and/or "universal/divine" law human rights.
Dear Jim,
Extremely well put. Now, let's all go to Court and demand what is ours.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message ----- From: Jim To: John Wilson ; c m Sent: Monday, October 15, 2007 11:26 PM
Subject: Re: The Internet Under Attack from Bureaucratic Terrorists
Hi John and Colleen,
I don't know if Colleen was being sarcastic when she wrote, "As you and everyone else knows we have NO RIGHTS AND WE HAVE TO DO AS WE ARE TOLD... and... Australian Slave with NO Rights and Corporate Merchandise," but I would like to comment on this.
The fact of
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 16, 2007 |
|
“No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the lawful judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land” (Magna Carta 1215).
MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE IS FRAUD:
FRAUDULENT LOAN CONTRACTS:
Under COMMON LAW, there are 8 essential elements for the creation of a contract, ie: (1) offer; (2) acceptance; (3) sufficient consideration; (4) intention to enter legal relations; (5) capacity to contract; (6) legality of purpose; (7) genuine consent; and (8) certainty of terms.
VARIABLE INTEREST RATES render a contract void for uncertainty. To make out that an illegal contract is valid is fraud and obtaining money by fraud is stealing.
FRAUDULENT DEFAULT JUDGMENTS:
“No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 14, 2007 |
|
under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William Blackstone wrote) has alw
LEVELS OF JURISDICTION
OR
THE RULES OF THE GAME
It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 29, 2007 |
|
If you're immigrating to this country and you don't like the rules that are in place then you have the right to choose not to live here.
Lost and expound
By MICHAEL COREN Sun Media 9-30-7
There was a time when the West was thought to be synonymous with freedom and liberty. Mind you, there was a time when Canada was thought to be synonymous with freedom and liberty. Not so now. In Vancouver impresario Bruce Allen, manager of Canadian musicians such as Michael Buble and Bryan Adams, is under attack for what he said in one of his weekly radio editorials. There are calls for him to be fired, for his radio station to be punished and for Allen to be removed from the 2010 Winter Olympics' creative team. "This is all very
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 29, 2007 |
|
It appears there is, in fact, no 'continuity of government', meaning
Dear The Expose,
It does make "ultimate sense" ....... now, we need hard copy evidence of the correspondence from QE2.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message ----- From: The Exposé To: John Wilson Sent: Saturday, September 29, 2007 7:11 AM
Subject: RE: NSW Attorney-General to argue Constitution in Local Court
John, RE: "Any of you people sued by The Queen in the Right of Australia? In Canada we are sued by the Attorney General on behalf of the Queen in the Right of Canada.
So people have written to the Queen asking her if they owed her any money. Her reply was
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 27, 2007 |
|
Part of Patriot Act ruled unconstitutional Provisions allow search warrants issued without probable cause
The Constitution of the United States is the most sacred document protecting human rights since the Magna Carta. Every U.S. congressman and senator who voted for the Patriot Act violated the oath they took to defend the Constitution of the United States when they assumed office. The U.S. president violated his oath of office by failing to veto the bill as being unconstitutional. Not a whimper from the media! MSNBC.com
Part of Patriot Act ruled unconstitutional Provisions allow search warrants issued without probable cause, she says
The Associated Press
Updated: 5:40 a.m. PT Sept
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 27, 2007 |
|
Magna Carta 2007 - an updated version to protect us from an overweening State
Magna Carta 2007 - an updated version to protect us from an overweening StateBy PETER OBORNE - More by this author » Last updated at 01:04am on 27th September 2007 Comments (29) One of the very few surviving copies of the Magna Carta - the famous document that is the foundation of British liberty - has come up for sale in New York. Experts say this copy of the charter will sell for as much as £6million. But the protections written out in the Magna Carta back in 1215 are priceless and never in our history have they come under such sustained and ruthless attack as during the ten years of this Labour
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 26, 2007 |
|
You go by Petition for Writ of Mandamus, for the High Court of Australia to compel the lower court to do their duty.
Dear Michael,
Good one.
We'll give them 2 weeks.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Kearns To: John Wilson Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2007 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Indictment of Judge in the NSW Court of Appeal.
John: You can go to the High Court of Australia.You go by Petition for Writ of Mandamus, for the High Court of Australia to compel the lower court to do their duty.The delay, delay, delay, is beyond reasonable and prudent, and in the interest of justice, you demand the High Court of Australia to compel the lower court to act,
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 26, 2007 |
|
"Freedom is the emancipation from the arbitrary rule of other men."
"Fear of serious injury cannot alone justify suppression offree speech and assembly. Men feared witches and burned women.It is the function of speech to free men from the bondage ofirrational fears."-- Justice Louis D. Brandeis(1856-1941) US Supreme Court JusticeSource: Whitney v. California, 1927 quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Louis.Brandeis.Quote.1699
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 25, 2007 |
|
The artificial dividing of law into
Dear Michael,
A step in the right direction - but Juries judge law and fact in all cases. The artificial dividing of law into "civil", "criminal", "equity", "admiralty", etc., with the intention of excluding or putting restrictions on Juries, is immoral and, therefore, unlawful.
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 24, 2007 |
|
DEMOCRACY or TOTALITARIANISM
DEMOCRACY or TOTALITARIANISM:
TOTALITARIANISM. “In a totalitarian state, the goal is to serve the needs of an expanding industrial order and the complexities of bureaucratic government” (Science News Letter). “The extension of government control to all major aspects of social life, typically in the forceful pursuit of a single, overriding objective, and without regard for individual rights or the rule of law” (Encyc. Btir.)
The “overriding objective” being to establish a “ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT”, controlled by the INTERNATIONAL BANKS, sovereign over all the PEOPLE of the World. The International
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 23, 2007 |
|
“No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the lawful judgment of his own equals indeed the law of the land”
MORTGAGE FORECLOSURE IS FRAUD:
FRAUDULENT LOAN CONTRACTS:
Under COMMON LAW, there are 8 essential elements for the creation of a contract, ie: (1) offer; (2) acceptance; (3) sufficient consideration; (4) intention to enter legal relations; (5) capacity to contract; (6) legality of purpose; (7) genuine consent; and (8) certainty of terms.
VARIABLE INTEREST RATES render a contract void for uncertainty. To make out that an illegal contract is valid is fraud and obtaining money by fraud is stealing.
FRAUDULENT DEFAULT JUDGMENTS:
“No Freeman shall be dispossessed unless by the
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 22, 2007 |
|
Liberty Quotes September 21st 2007
"With every civil right there has to bea corresponding civil obligation."-- Edison Haines quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Edison.Haines.Quote.95B3"When they took the 4th Amendment, I was quiet because I didn't deal drugs.When they took the 6th Amendment, I was quiet because I am innocent.When they took the 2nd Amendment, I was quiet because I don't own a gun.Now they have taken the 1st Amendment, and I can only be quiet."-- Lyle Myhr quotes.liberty-tree.ca/quote_blog/Lyle.Myhr.Quote.4FA2
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 21, 2007 |
|
It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”.
LEVELS OF JURISDICTION
OR
THE RULES OF THE GAME
It is the game of “World Control”. It is a serious game and the stakes are the highest imaginable, because we stand to lose our Rights to “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”. In the 18th century, when the American Colonies were suffering at the hands of a despotic King, they knew what they were entitled to under English Common Law which has, as it’s foundation, the Charters of Liberty such as Magna Carta 1215, Petition of Right 1627, Habeas Corpus 1640 and the Bill of Rights 1688, and that “the glory of English law” (as Sir William
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 16, 2007 |
|
which only proves that Trial by Jury is a threat to the anti-democratic heirarchy of those Member States.
Dear chas x,
The Geneva Human Rights Commission endorsed it but the New York Assembly of Member States' representatives rejected it...which only proves that Trial by Jury is a threat to the anti-democratic heirarchy of those Member States. My case only proves that, if ordinary People want Truth, Justice, Freedom and Democracy, they're going to have to overthrow the evil Elites of the world.
Did you get that top-notch video at www.youtube.com/watch?v=1dHHmpUndfE ?
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
www.rightsandwrong.com.au/html/un.html
[full story]
|
|
| Sep 12, 2007 |
|
The bad get rich and the good get poorer
Dear Mark,
The bad get rich and the good get poorer....in the meantime, in between time, ain't we got hope.
We all have consciences. Mine says, "Don't give in to the bastards."
Yours sincerely,
John Wilson.
[full story]
|
|
| Aug 24, 2007 |
|
the fate of the world depends on the future of the families in all countries on all continents.
We Are Different, but TogetherWe Are Family That Believes In Family
“Certain truths are self evident …nature does not lie. Great nations cannot wish reality away or they will soon become the great nations of yesterday.” Dr. Margaret A. Ogola, Kenya, pediatrician and director for Medical Affairs, Cottolengo Home for Children Living with AIDS
Dear Friends of the Family,
As a citizen of the great nation of Canada, the statement above has stuck with me since attending the World Congress of Families IV (WCF IV) in Warsaw, Poland last spring. Poland stands tall in Europe as a great nation and as
[full story]
|
|
| Jul 31, 2007 |
|
Secular Humanist Creed
I believe in ME, to be the god and saviour of my own life and destiny and, as god, I will not tolerate or permit the suggestion that there is a God other than or superior to ME to whom I am to answer or give account or bow.
I believe, as god, I am entitled to make statements, claims and demands upon the lesser gods, regardless of how untrue, false, unreasonable, petulant,
[full story]
|
|
| Oct 8, 2003 |
|
Rule of law is fundamental to the governance of a state; consequently, it is regarded as a symbol of sovereignty.
SEE: “NWO Court, (ICC), Justice, & Law & Order” under “Issues Research” By Paul Janiczek Helen of Sparta left for Troy of her own accord. By divine behest, Paris the Trojan took her hand after being promised it by Aphrodite, the busybody of Greek mythology. In their wake, they left Helen's numerous broken-hearted suitors. It was a stupid move on the part of Paris to pick a fight with so many would-be beaus in one stroke. A great war ensued. This episode of mythology is meant to explain the origin of the costliest war of Greek antiquity save the Peloponnesian War. Through ancient fiction,
[full story]
|
|
